<div dir="ltr">Hola, les comparto este artículo de The Guardian. Saludos, Mario.<br><br><div><div class="gmail_quote">---------- Forwarded message ----------<br>From: <b class="gmail_sendername">David Pengelley</b> <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:davidp@nmsu.edu">davidp@nmsu.edu</a>></span><br>Date: 2017-07-02 18:08 GMT+02:00<br>Subject: [ALGTOP-L] Topology journals in context<br>To: <a href="mailto:algtop-l@lists.lehigh.edu">algtop-l@lists.lehigh.edu</a><br>Cc: <a href="mailto:davidp@nmsu.edu">davidp@nmsu.edu</a><br><br><br><br>
This illuminating article puts the struggles over the journal Topology, its Pergamon origins, and its replacement non-profit topology journals, in a bigger context with a fascinating, if depressing, view of the past, present, future, and how they all remain intertwined.<br>
<br>
<a href="https://www.theguardian.com/science/2017/jun/27/profitable-business-scientific-publishing-bad-for-science?utm_source=New+Daily+Newsletter+Subscribers&utm_campaign=7b5a62cfd7-EMAIL_CAMPAIGN_2017_06_27&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_4675a5c15f-7b5a62cfd7-81874177" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://www.theguardian.com/sc<wbr>ience/2017/jun/27/profitable-<wbr>business-scientific-<wbr>publishing-bad-for-science?<wbr>utm_source=New+Daily+Newslette<wbr>r+Subscribers&utm_campaign=<wbr>7b5a62cfd7-EMAIL_CAMPAIGN_<wbr>2017_06_27&utm_medium=email&<wbr>utm_term=0_4675a5c15f-<wbr>7b5a62cfd7-81874177</a><br>
<br>
Best wishes<br>
David<br>
<br>
______________________________<wbr>_________________<br>
ALGTOP-L mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:ALGTOP-L@lists.lehigh.edu" target="_blank">ALGTOP-L@lists.lehigh.edu</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.lehigh.edu/mailman/listinfo/algtop-l" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.lehigh.edu/mailm<wbr>an/listinfo/algtop-l</a><br>
</div><br></div></div>